House Approves Non-Traditional Green Line Construction Method, Says State Rep

Somerville State Rep. Denise Provost says the Massachusetts House has approved a construction model that could speed up the project and lead to more accountability.

The Massachusetts House of Representatives has approved a non-traditional planning and construction method for the Green Line extension, according to Somerville State Rep. Denise Provost, who sits on the Joint Committee on Transportation.

The Construction Manager/General Contractor model has been used for buildings in Massachusetts, "but not for transportation projects," Provost said, speaking to Somerville Patch Friday.

CM/GC, as it's known, is "meant to speed up the project," the state representative said. She also said "it gives the contractor better incentive to come in as close to budget and timetable as possible."

The CM/GC planning and construction model is designed to encourage more collaboration between project designers and the construction firm that will ultimately build the  project.

The method allows for a construction manager to provide insight and advice during the planning phase, according to a description of the method provided by the Federal Highway Administration.

The construction manager collaborates with designers about costs, logistics and on-the-ground construction realities, and when the design is close to completion, the state and the construction manager negotiate a "guaranteed maximum price" for completing the project, according to the description. This is intended to keep costs predictable.

Under the traditional procurement method, the state hires an architecture and engineering firm to design the project, and then once the design is complete it hires a construction firm to build the project.

The Puget Sound Business Journal, writing about CM/GC back in 1996, said of this traditional method, "If the project encounter[s] delays or cost overruns, the result [is] often lawsuits and counter lawsuits, as the architect and builder [seek] to lay the blame at each other's feet."

Delays, cost overruns and legal disputes have certainly been the case with big transportation projects in Massachusetts.

Provost acknowledged "there's a legacy of concern about the management and execution of big transportation projects" in the state.

She said the CM/GC method is meant to create "a substantial unity of responsibility for the project."

Among other things, the construction manager will be responsible for conducting at least half the work, Provost said, which cuts out long lists of less-accountable subcontractors. She also said the method works well with a project that's completed in phases, such as the planned Green Line extension, allowing the state to assess each phase in terms of quality and cost.

Provost said the this will be "a pilot program" for the state in regard to overseeing big transportation projects.

"It has to go through the Senate," the state representative said, "but it's a milestone for the Green Line."

Somerville Home Owner June 05, 2012 at 02:48 PM
hmm... guaranteed maximum price. Sounds like if the estimates are off, the contractors will cut corners to avoid losing money.
Olympic Roofing October 30, 2012 at 09:33 PM
As a Somerville roofing contractor (www.olympicroofing.com/somerville-ma-roofing), we've been using the construction manager/general contractor model for decades with great success. We've used for more than just roofing too - For a wide-range of projects that include general construction, painting, restoration, commercial building work, and more. I see no reason why it wouldn't work out well, so long as the construction crew does not cut corners.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »