.

Guest Post: Cycletracks and Making Parking Work

Somerville resident and Parking Consultant Mark Chase shares his thoughts on the proposal to remove some parking on Beacon Street to make room for cycle tracks.

Mark Chase is a Somerville resident and Parking Consultant for Nelson Nygaard Consulting Associates, which specializes in transit and multimodal transportation planning. He recently authored an article, which he has asked me to share, with his thoughts and analysis regarding the proposal to remove some on-street parking from Beacon Street in Somerville in order to create room for cycle tracks.

Somerville Massachusetts: Cycletracks and Making Parking Work

By Mark Chase
January 22, 2013

The City of Somerville is proposing to reconstruct Beacon Street in the near future.  One of the proposed features of the new street design is a cycle track that will serve a broader group of cyclists who are not comfortable riding in traditional bike lanes.  The proposal is controversial because it would eliminate parking on one side of the street to accommodate the proposed cycle track.   This has created conflict between those who feel there is not enough parking on Beacon Street and those who would like to see better bicycle facilities on the street. 

Problems with parking on Beacon Street can easily be seen as simply not enough parking.  The true picture is more complex than that. There are many different parking needs on the street.  A simple way to categorize the needs would be by business or resident, but even this is an over-simplification.  By looking at the resources and needs of these groups in more detail, we can see some important nuances that can help instruct what options are available to meet the parking needs of Beacon streets residents, business owners and customers. 

Business Needs

On-street & Off-street

To begin, it’s necessary to distinguish between those businesses who have off-street parking and those whose customers must use street parking. On Beacon Street there are both types. For instance, Star Market—perhaps the largest business on Beacon Street—has an abundance of off-street parking, to the point that they may be willing to rent their excess parking to the City.   On the other hand, there are several businesses on Beacon Street who rely on on-street parking to meet all their parking needs.  But even among those businesses that rely entirely on street parking, their needs will vary based on the amount of time their customers need to park. 

Short-term & Long-term Parking Needs

The businesses whose customers require only short-term parking pose markedly different challenges than the businesses who have longer term parking needs. One rule-of-thumb is that the longer a person is staying in a location, the further they will be willing to walk from a parking space to their destination. To illustrate, a customer who will be spending 3 or 4 hours over dinner at a restaurant would likely be willing to park further from his destination than a customer parking to pick up take-out food.

On Beacon Street there is very little short term parking. This favors businesses with long term parking needs as any available parking may not be directly in front of the store. Take for example two businesses on the western end of Beacon Street:  Café Rustica and the Beacon Street Laundromat. Both have no off-street parking and have a mix of long and short term customers. Short term customers who drive to these businesses probably have some difficulty finding parking on Beacon Street at peak times.  Therefore it is understandable that they are concerned about losing curb-side parking.

Furthermore, some businesses are more car-oriented than others. Whereas an auto-repair shop may have 100% of its customers arrive by car, other businesses may find that most of their customers arrive on foot or by bike. While there are several auto-only-oriented businesses on Beacon Street, all of them appear to have adequate off-street parking.   Whether parking is removed from one side of the street or not, there remains a challenge for businesses with a substantial customer base who drive, but rely on short term on-street parking.  Potential solutions to this are posed later on.  First let us turn to residential parking. 

Residential Parking

While residents have different needs than businesses, many similar principles and challenges apply. Off-street residential parking on Beacon Street appears to be about average for Somerville in that some houses have abundant off street parking (they have paved their entire lot), while others have no parking or only tandem parking. 

As in much of Somerville, many car-owners opt not to use their driveways when they can easily park on the street.  After all, a City parking permit costs less than $3 a month, while off-street spaces on Craigslist retail for between $75 and $100 a month. In defense of those who use on-street spaces when they have off-street parking, on-street spaces are often the most convenient parking space to a resident’s front door. 

One important item to note: Beacon Street has street sweeping twice a week every week from March 1st through December 31st. This rigorous sweeping schedule makes the very-long-term (2+ days) residential parking seen on other Somerville street (where cars need only be moved every two weeks) impossible on Beacon Street for most of the year. 

Parking During Street Sweeping

There has been some discussion online about whether the City’s parking study adequately captured the student population or took into account the effects of street sweeping. Suffering from chronic insomnia, and having perhaps an unhealthy interest in my neighborhood’s parking problems, I conducted my own parking counts during street sweeping (midnight to 6AM) on four nights in November and early December. Given the cold weather and the fact that I was alone and on a bicycle, I only counted empty spaces on a block by block basis.

These are my results:

Street Sweeping / No-Parking North Side

Between And 11/13/2012 12:30 AM
Available Spaces 12/4/2012 5:30 AM
Available Spaces Roseland Oxford 2 3 Oxford Forest 2 5 Forest Prentiss 2 0 Prentiss Harris 1 0 Harris Eustis 1 0 Eustis Sacramento 2 1 Sacramento Museum 5 9 Museum Scott St/
Park St Too many to count Too many to count Scott St/
Park St Kirkland/ Washington Too many to count Too many to count Kirkland/ Washington Smith 2 8 Smith Coonet 2 5 Cooney Concord 5 7 Concord City Line 3 8

Street Sweeping / No Parking South Side

Between And 12/6/2012 3:00 AM
Available Spaces 12/13/2012 5:30 AM
Available Spaces Beacon Miller 1 1 Miller Sacramento 1 0 Sacramento Kent 3 3 Kent Ivaloo 9 100% Empty Ivaloo Morgan 100% Empty 100% Empty Morgan Park 100% Empty 100% Empty Park Properzi 5 1 car parked
between Properzi 
& Washington Properzi Hanson 5 Hanson Washington 6 Washington Calvin 3 3 Calvin Waldo 3 5 Waldo Buckingham 4 5 Buckingham Concord 7 5 Concord City Line 8 5 City Line Inman Square/
Cambridge 4 4

As you can see, demand during arguably the most parking-constrained situation varies quite a bit over the entire length of Beacon Street. A quick glance shows that the highest demand on-street occurs at the Oxford Street end of Beacon.  Thus whether or not you have any trouble finding parking during street-sweeping will depend greatly by which block you live on. 

I did not have the time or energy to count off-street parking availability. That said, I could still easily observe that Star Market and most of the larger business lots were almost entirely empty. This is not surprising given that the businesses are closed in the middle of the night.  Additionally, a quick glance at the driveways revealed that although many driveways were full, others had available capacity.  In fact there were a few driveways that were completely empty.  

Managing Parking on Beacon Street 

Solutions

In my consulting practice, it is common to hear from clients and the public that building a parking garage will solve a parking shortage. In a few cases this is true. In the majority of cases (and especially on Beacon Street), people are unwilling to pay the cost of a parking garage in either user fees or higher taxes. As noted above, even during street sweeping there is some available parking on Beacon Street. The problem is that there’s little incentive for healthy, able-bodied people to walk to it. 

In order to get the most out of Beacon Street’s on- and off-street parking, I recommend trying a combination of well-designed regulations and judicious pricing to achieve the following goals:

●     Encourage able-bodied, long-term parkers (2+ hours) to park in less desirable further-away parking spaces

●     Make short term curb-side/ close to curb-side parking available for business owners during the hours that they need them

●     Incentivize business owners and residents to make their under-utilized driveways and parking lots available to those who could use the parking. 

●     Fully inform and make clear to residents, businesses and customers the range of parking (and non-driving) options available

Goal Regulation Pricing Encourage walking to further available spaces Relax parking regulations in areas with available parking. Tighten parking regulations in areas where demand is scarce. Example: In front of businesses, limit parking to 2 hours with no residential exception during business hours. Install parking meters in front of businesses; create a pricing structure that reflects actual demand on different parts of Beacon Street. Make short term curbside / close to curbside parking available for business owners  Put time limits on parking; limit residential uses of curbside business spaces during business hours. Install meters. Have free available parking a short walk from prime metered spaces. Encourage use of City Business Permit Parking Program to discourage employee parking in prime spaces. Entice business owners and residents to make their under-utilized driveways and parking lots available

With large lots like Star Market, the City could rent a large number of spaces from the store and make them available for public use.

For smaller lots and driveways the City could specifically encourage rental of available spaces to Somerville businesses and residents.

The City could go further and require that all business lots be publicly available during non-business hours.

Raise the price of 2nd and 3rd car residential permits so that they more accurately reflect the cost of parking in Somerville.

This would encourage 2+ car households to use their driveways while not penalizing 1-car households.

Fully inform residents, businesses and customers of the range of parking options available Include flyers in City correspondence to landlords and tenants on the range of options for parking. Develop clear signage which helps people locate parking appropriate to their abilities and needs.

This is in no way a comprehensive list. Rather, I hope you will consider them a catalyst for creativity in solving Beacon Streets parking challenge—one that’s not so very different from other streets in Somerville.

More Information

Parking Reform

Beacon Street Reconstruction Project

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Joe Beckmann January 25, 2013 at 01:13 PM
Mark Chase is one of the better reasons to live in Somerville. Not only good observations but excellent information. Thanks.
Jake January 25, 2013 at 03:05 PM
I feel this is just another example of the city deciding what they'd like to do and then making the facts fit their plan. How do you go out one night and decide parking isn't an issue? Or that some driveways are empty and should be used? Or that people should be willing to park and walk further away? The variables that are not taken into account are huge.
Charlie Denison January 25, 2013 at 04:31 PM
Jake, I can understand why it seems that way. However, I should note that the City's consultants did the parking study over 3 separate days in May and June 2012. Furthermore, the City was originally considering installing cycle tracks for the entire length (and removing parking on one side for the entire length as well). But since the parking study determined that the parking utilization was above 50% between Washington St and Inman Square, the City opted to leave parking on both sides through that part of the project and install bike lanes there instead.
Chev January 25, 2013 at 06:41 PM
"One of the proposed features of the new street design is a cycle track that will serve a broader group of cyclists who are not comfortable riding in traditional bike lanes." The current plan is misleading. I appreciate the effort but the proposed cycle track is for only 4/10 of a mile. How will a cycle track, that only runs from the top of Beacon street to Museum street, encourage a "broader group of cyclist"? No one goes for a 3 block bike ride!? If a real goal of the Beacon street reconstruction is to make the street safer and more accessible to cyclists then the cycle track should extend for longer than 4/10th of a mile.
Rog January 25, 2013 at 09:19 PM
If the bike lane isn't the entire length of Beacon street where is it proposed? The above graphic says Oxford - Museum and Park - Washington. Is that accurate? If so, then the design seems backwards. According to the above data, there is currently less parking available in the areas where the bike lane is proposed. 96 available spots Washington -> Inman 67 available spots Oxford -> Washington (not including "too many to count" but even it that 20 spots, it's still less) What am I missing here?... Does the city parking study show different results?
Phototaker67 January 25, 2013 at 11:54 PM
The parking study is flawed. It shows numbers that are clearly taken when schools are out of session, backed up by the college websites of when students are in session. It is another case of fitting facts to support one side of the argument.
Alex January 28, 2013 at 12:15 AM
Chev: I agree that many people want the cycletracks to ultimately extend all the way to Inman Square, and from there to Kendall Square and onto the planned cycletracks/buffered bike lanes on the Longfellow Bridge into Boston. But we have to start somewhere and keep the bigger vision in mind. Think about it: the Green Line Extension is being built in phases, and no matter how much of it is built in the short term, there will be immediate benefits to the community and the chances that more will get built are much better than if we'd never started. I think the same is true of bike facilities like cycletracks.
BrianM January 30, 2013 at 01:07 AM
This is the most nuanced look I've seen yet at the parking issues that the project as originally designed failed to address. Thanks.
gill April 12, 2013 at 12:20 PM
abusiness-ideas I would like to say thank for sharing this great article. We can’t get this kind of information from http://www.abusiness-ideas.com
junaid April 12, 2013 at 12:21 PM
THANKS FOR SHARING SUCH A GREATE INFORMATION http://earningmoneyonlinetipsandtricks.blogspot.com/

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something