patching...
Update: Get the latest Somerville headlines in your inbox every morning with the Somerville Patch daily newsletter »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

TELL US: Bring Back Happy Hour?

Should happy hour come back to Massachusetts?

 

Is happy hour coming back to the Bay State?

The 28-year-old “happy hour law” now banning Massachusetts bars and restaurants from pouring free, discounted or two-for-one alcoholic beverages in area restaurants may be updated so restaurants can compete with casinos that may one day be in the state.

As part of the ban, cities and towns now rule that a beverage must be priced the same for each calendar week and two drinks can only be served per person at a restaurant. In addition, pitchers of alcohol can only be served to two or more people, according to the Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission.

The ABCC will hold a hearing in Boston on Aug. 21. Four other hearings will be held throughout the state to gain public feedback. 

According to an article in the Boston Herald, the casino bill passed last year requires the ABCC to complete a study by Jan. 31 of whether the happy hour law should be updated or amended.

The happy hour law was enacted in part to prevent intoxicated people from being over-served and driving under the influence, the Herald article said.

Do you think local restaurants need "happy hour" to compete with casinos in the future? Or do the costs outweigh the benefits? Tell us what you think in the comments below.

Related Topics: Alcohol, Casinos, Happy Hour, and Restaurants

Ron Newman

11:19 am on Friday, August 17, 2012

Yes, it should be repealed for any bar or restaurant that is on or near a transit line.

Reply

billvill

11:23 am on Friday, August 17, 2012

Funny that this appears in the business section. Throwing ethics to the wind, it makes good business sense. That being said, I think we'd see a drastic increase in the already appalling number of alcohol related deaths if this law were to be repealed. Answer to your question is a resounding NO!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

david mokal

4:11 pm on Saturday, August 18, 2012

Your Right Bill thats why they did away with Happy Hour in the first place. No to mention it will drive up the insurance rates as well with all the accidents.

Comment_arrow

Dee

4:21 pm on Saturday, August 18, 2012

so, happy hour equals death? i guess it's the same logic as the spoon makes people fat...Bring back Happy Hour!

JJ

1:25 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012

Is the fear that alcohol related deaths increasing the result of data or just speculation? Going to a bar to enjoy happy hour doesn't make me more likely to drive under the influence. I don't drink and drive--end of story. Others do, I realize this, but the question is are they more likely to do so if their pint of beer is $3 instead of $6 or if their glass of wine is $5 instead of $10?

The few annual statistics I've found about the number of fatalities in MA have shown an overall decrease in fatalities over the years, but the decrease didn't coincide with the introduction of the ban. One would wonder if the overall decrease in this has more to do with public awareness and police reinforcement. I don't claim to feel strongly one way or the other, but I have to admit that I remain skeptical that a law like this has a strong impact on whether or not people will actually obey the law.

Reply

ella watson

1:55 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012

....just take a look at the patrons that come out of drinking establishments in medford any night of the week...stumbling out the door swaying to the car..and off they go.
I've seen it and have recorded it. I say NO to happy hour. Our police have enough to do, we don't need more drunk drivers on the road. sober driver choose not to stop at crosswalks..drunks just fly-by. Its happening in every corner of medford..Just today I went for coffee in medford square...so did a guy ...only he went to the liquor store on Salem street and got a brown bag breakfast...9:15 am. Then sat near Salem burial grounds..sipping away. so again I say NO

Reply
Comment_arrow

bill t

2:56 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012

Thought this was a Tewksbury forum , the Medford drunks sitting at the burial grounds have nothing to do with happy hour, nor do the late night stumblers .

Comment_arrow

RS

2:58 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012

Did you take any of these recordings to the police to say "Hey, Bars X, Y, and Z are consistently letting drunk people get behind the wheel of a car"? I know the police can't arrest anyone based on the videos, but they can put an officer in those parking lots at night. Talking about it on the internet's not going to change anything. If you have proof that all these Medford drinking establishments (which are WHERE, by the way? I can only think of three "bars" in Medford, and I wouldn't even call them bars) are consistently letting drunk people get behind the wheel of a car, you need to contact the authorities or at the very least, show the video to the bars/restaurants' managers so they can educate their bartenders a little more about when to cut someone off.

Comment_arrow

Daniel DeMaina

3:03 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012

@billt — Because this is a statewide issue facing all communities, this particular article is shared among several sites in the region.

Comment_arrow

Jameson Bull

4:00 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012

Let's be serious. Happy hours have no impact on people having a "brown bag breakfast." If you are an alcoholic and can't afford a drink at the bar, you'll tip back whatever'll get the job done. Any time of day.

Drunk driving and alcoholism are much more complex issues than one happy hour law can address. Killing it or keeping it will only have a minor impact in either direction because there are so many other factors at play.

Maybe let bars reduce prices (with controls), but add on an extra tax when they do. Then earmark that extra money towards cops patrolling for DWIs and alcohol abuse and rehab programs.

Comment_arrow

PK

8:13 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012

Wow, you actually go around recording what poeple do. I don't believe that people should be driving under the influence but recording them and following a guy to the burial grounds? Seems a bit busy bodyish to me

Comment_arrow

Dee

4:23 pm on Saturday, August 18, 2012

that guy wasn't at happy hour, so it has no place in this thread, your detracting from the point. and that fact that you reference him right after the drunk driver comments, it appears that he probably doesn't have a car (just a guess)

Cathy J.

3:39 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012

No need for a happy hour. It only encourages people to drink more than they should.

Reply

BAV

4:12 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012

Happy hours encourage people to drink fast while the drinks are cheap. Here in MA we are lucky to have some of the lowest vehicle fatality rates in the country. No reason to take a step back.

Reply
Comment_arrow

ella watson

4:39 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012

I agree with Cathy j and BAV

Mike G.

4:33 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012

People wonder why they call this state a "Nanny State".

Banning happy hour will definitely stop people from drinking and driving, because it's not like they can't already buy drinks at the bar. /sarcasm

Reply

Kevin

5:13 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012

Yes we should bring back happy hours.They increase competition and are good for consumers. We've come a long way in public awareness, law enforcement, and in holding bars responsible for not over-serving. If we keep cracking down on bars that over serve and people who break the law, and keep educating the public, I don't think happy hours will cause a significant uptick in reckless behavior.

Reply

Diana

5:33 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012

I think all hours should be happy. Why do you people hate happiness?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike G.

5:40 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012

^this. Open your minds, folks.

Comment_arrow

Janet

3:33 pm on Saturday, August 18, 2012

Excellent point, Diana...they just like to make life miserable.

rocky racoon

6:08 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012

I don't think they should bring back happy hour

Reply
Comment_arrow

Janet

3:30 pm on Saturday, August 18, 2012

awwwwww, sounds like rocky racoon dosent like to partay. party pooper.

rocky racoon

6:12 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012

And I say this because I like having the goverment tell me what I can do, when I can do it and pretty much babysitting me 24/7. Grow up folks. Happy hours will not increase drunk driving. Make the bars responsible for their patrons and get goverment out of our private lives. Way too much oversight now. They feel they need to tell us how to live our lives daily. I'm a grown man. I can make decisions for myself about how much I drink. If your against happy hours then you should be for prohibition. Ban all alcohol because we are to stupid to handle it andthe goverment knows what's best for us (pat on the head)

Reply
Comment_arrow

quasimodo

8:45 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012

“Make the bars responsible for their patrons… “ But they ALREADY are responsible, and not only the bars, a person throwing a private party in his/her own house is responsible for his/her guests. However, the Government that you say is in “our private lives,” does not, or rarely, enforces the law. So, this Government must not be sooooo involved in our lives after all.

Meggle

8:56 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012

While I don't believe in government limits on personal use of drugs, Alcohol is indeed a fairly dangerous and addictive drug. There's a case to be made that we are indeed too stupid to handle alcohol. It's pretty often linked to violent crime. http://pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/arh25-1/20-31.htm

You kind of have to wonder where one draws the line. If this particular drug is tightly linked with triggering people to infringe the liberty of others, is it irresponsible of a society to allow it to flow even more freely? Personally, I doubt happy hour will actually have an impact on crime or anything like that...I don't think that alcohol consumption could possibly increase that much. I couldn't quickly find any comparable situations.

Reply

Josh Hill

6:37 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012

I just lived in No. VA the last 3 years, there, DC, MD, all had Happy Hour. It was a blast and makes great buisness sense! Responsible bar tenders need to be aware of who they serve, period.

Reply

Rachelle

7:18 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012

As long as they have backgammon :)
Those were the good ol' days & everyone had fun. Today everything is an issue and/or a problem.
Take the focus off booze consumption. I always looked forward to the apps ( which in those days meant appetizers :) & just going with family & being amongst people taking time out to relax!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jessica

8:13 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012

Rachelle, I agree about the apps. Thats the part I would like to see!!

Joe Gray

7:21 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012

H E double hockey sticks, Yeah!! Misguided PC nonsense to get rid of it in first place. Proved nothing and suppressed business options.

Reply

Jessica

7:33 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012

I am sick of all the laws in this state. That being said.....now that my kids are almost at drinking age, I'm ok with this law remaining in place for the next ten years.

Reply

cindy

8:11 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012

yes, bring happy hour back. I dont recall being to a happy hour I probably was not old enough to drink yet, but I would love to have cheap drinks and be able to safely take public transportation home at a reasonable hour and a reasonable time. all this nonsense about ppl drink more with cheap drinks is inaccurate, they cant make them fast enough during regular hrs I cant see them pumping them out faster when the prices are cheaper. it's like going to foxwoods, you get free drinks but you wait forever to get a drink. This truly is a nanny state. Always has been for decades musicians use to get banned in Boston. If someone goes to the liquor store 9:15am and then sits on a bench and starts drinking they are alcoholics this person needs this drink ,if not they will go into withdrawl have seizures/and or delirium and could die if not treated. This type of person does not hang out at bars, they dont make the drink strong enough. These ppl have a medical condition and should not be compared to ppl who are responsible. If you see someone stumbling out of a bar, that is the bartenders fault for not shutting them off and I have seen people shut off before.

Reply

Jessica

8:14 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012

Besides, people just go to college if they want to binge drink.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

William Laforme

8:33 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012

I move that if we bring back happy hour, we also bring back those medallions and big-collared shirts that everybody used to wear to Happy Hour...

Reply

Janet

3:27 pm on Saturday, August 18, 2012

Bring back Happy Hour...Time to Partaaaayyyy!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Janet

3:47 pm on Saturday, August 18, 2012

Y'all got to loosen up and have a few drinks, maybe you won't be so up tight.

Guy Ferrone

3:45 pm on Saturday, August 18, 2012

How about a siesta at work each day too?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Diana

3:58 pm on Saturday, August 18, 2012

That would be awesome, especially if they moved Happy Hour to noon. :)

I don't care what y'all think of me; I'm coming down firmly on the side of half-price drinks, free apps, afternoon siestas and the entire month of August off.

david mokal

4:14 pm on Saturday, August 18, 2012

Hey what the Heck move happy hour th 8 am opening to closing legallize drugs too that way it will keep the population down.

Reply

cindy

7:10 pm on Saturday, August 18, 2012

i think having happy hour would be beneficial. I dont know about some of you but most ppl I know drink at home first then go to the bar. Drinks are to pricey so we start at home. sounds like this might be worse, no?

Reply

malcolm nichols

12:58 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012

And the drinking age should be 18 again, and we certainly need to eliminate the seatbelt law. Where is Jerry Williams when you need him.

Reply

Nancy Syndrella

5:03 am on Friday, August 24, 2012

The few annual statistics I've found about the number of fatalities in MA have shown an overall decrease in fatalities over the years, but the decrease didn't coincide with the introduction of the ban.
http://floraandmuse.com/blog/fun-restaurants-in-houston/

Reply

Leave a comment