patching...
Update: Get the latest Somerville headlines in your inbox every morning with the Somerville Patch daily newsletter »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Six Developers Submit Powder House School Proposals

A review committee will assess the proposals this spring, according to a city spokesperson.

 

Update, March 8: According to an email from the Somerville Community Corporation, they are the group behind the proposal put forth by Davis Square Architects. A clarification has been made below in the original story.

ORIGINAL STORY:

Six developers submitted proposals to build at the site of the Powder House Community School near Teele Square, according to the city of Somerville.

The school closed in 2004, and the city issued a request for proposals on Dec. 26, 2012, seeking development pitches for the 1.85-acre plot of land.

Proposals were due at the end of February, and here are the six development groups that submitted proposals:

Jaclyn Rossetti, a spokesperson for the city, said the next step in the process is to form a review committee to assess the six proposals.

The request for proposals says the mayor planned to recommend a development proposal to the Somerville Board of Aldermen by March 18, but Rossetti said the process would likely take longer than that, possibly into late spring or early summer.

That said, "The goal is to get things going as soon as possible," she said.

The review committee, officially named the Powder House Community School Technical Advisory Committee, according to the request proposals, will be composed of staff from the mayor's office, the purchasing department, the Office of Strategic Planning and Community Development and other representatives.

Rossetti said its members will likely be chosen in the next week or two.

More

City Officially Seeks Buyers for Powder House School Near Teele Square

City to 'Test the Waters' With Powder House School This Fall

Future of Powder House School and Teele Square Debated

Related Topics: Business, Government, Powder House School, and Real Estate

kevin thomas crowley

7:55 am on Wednesday, March 6, 2013

and the winner is already known by those in the know. this city is owned by developers.

Reply

Ron Newman

8:39 am on Wednesday, March 6, 2013

What type of project does each developer propose?

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Chris Orchard

12:26 pm on Wednesday, March 6, 2013

I don't yet know the types of projects each developer proposes, but I'm planning to work to find out. On the surface, it looks like most of the developers have residential backgrounds—all of them but Tufts—and the neighborhood, right near Davis Square, would likely be attractive for residential developers, so that's my speculation.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ron Newman

12:46 pm on Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Where can I find each of the proposals online? Is there a city website linking to each one, as there is for the Davis Square hotel proposals?

AHM

2:45 pm on Wednesday, March 6, 2013

In these times non paying Tufts should be swiftly removed from the list. They got enough free stuff here.

Reply

SomervilleGirl

5:53 pm on Wednesday, March 6, 2013

I agree, AHM, but hopefully they will choose the right alternative, if there is such a thing in our city. I would like to see more housing for our elderly who can no longer afford to live here, but as we have seen, unless the developer is making a killing in profits, nothing like that option will happen. The newcomers have dictated what goes into the city and they have the money to influence these decisions. Davis and now Assembly are clear examples of that agenda.

Reply

Sand Man

8:27 am on Friday, March 8, 2013

Jumbo has already trampled too much taxable property in this city--time to corral this rampaging beast....

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Chris Orchard

2:46 pm on Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Hi Ron, I'm still working to find out more about these proposals, and I don't think the city has put them online yet -- although it would be great if it did put them online.

Reply

kevin thomas crowley

8:58 am on Wednesday, March 13, 2013

we already GAVE western junior high school to tufts. no soup for you, tufts.
if the maxwell's green proposal resembles the wealthy enclave they built on lowell st., i hope it is recycled as toilet paper.
other 'luxury' proposals should receive little attention.
elderly housing, yes. give the land to the housing authority.
somerville community coporation , yes, if they present a solid,mixed community proposal.

Reply

JJ

12:27 pm on Wednesday, March 13, 2013

As a very nearby resident (if I practice enough, I could probably throw stones and hit the building), I don't mind the idea of a Tufts building going in. Their work would likely be good, and I imagine they would probably be more likely to dedicate real-estate to green space.

With that said, whatever the project is, I simply hope it's something backed by a responsible builder who is quick about its business. What I don't want is to have a massive 10-year construction project. Personally, I would love to see it as a residential project with some commercial space as part of the development (ground floor small green grocer, restaurant, etc) and a small park area. The cement garden currently there is easy maintenance, but serves for very little else. Unless you count using it as an under-lit space for high schoolers to drink out of brown paper bags.

Reply

daniela

1:01 pm on Wednesday, March 13, 2013

Why do our news organizations refuse to ask the mayor to answer to the very specific promises he made to the community when he closed the school? I believe Jaclyn Rossetti's mother was one of those who extracted the promise from our mayor, perhaps she remembers, if she's willing to divulge..........

Reply

Leave a comment