Should 1950s-Era Overpasses Come Down?
The state is deciding if other Boston neighborhoods will get the treatment Jamaica Plain is receiving — tearing down 1950s-era overpasses in favor of surface roads.
Urban planners no longer love the idea of putting elevated roadways through urban centers.
Even so, the state plans to spend millions of dollars shoring up two such overpasses — the McCarthy Overpass in Somerville, which carries the McGrath Highway, and the Bowker Overpass in Back Bay and Kenmore Square, which carries Storrow drive into Fenway — while they decide whether to tear them down and replace them with surface roads.
Somerville Patch asked in a poll "Should McGrath Highway be torn down?" and 82 percent of those who responded agreed with the statement, "Yes. It's a crumbling, dangerous curse on Somerville. One reader, Alex, called it the "Brown Monster" and said, "McGrath Highway is to East Somerville what the Berlin Wall was to East Berlin. Tear down this highway!"
Also this summer, Somerville Patch asked residents to weigh in on what they thought were the worst intersections in Somerville, and most of them chose exchanges that involved the old, crumbling highway.
Globe transportation reporter Eric Moskowitz recently surveyed urban planners, politicians and highway officials on the costs versus benefits of elevated roadways.
Many agreed that all eyes are watching the Casey Overpass project in JP, where one such 1950s-era overpass is being razed and replaced with surface roads. If that design moves traffic and people smoothly, it could pave the way for the demise of the McCarthy and Bowker overpasses.
Here is the Globe's full story (May require subscription to read full article.)
Jonah Petri
12:14 pm on Monday, August 27, 2012
Heh... "Brown Monster", I like it.
Tear it down.
Michael J Wade
12:42 pm on Monday, August 27, 2012
Tear the thing down yesterday. It's a relic of the olden days when Somerville was nothing more than a drive-thru for making life more convenient for Boston commuters. We need something that will better server the community where it resides.
Courtney O'Keefe
1:07 pm on Monday, August 27, 2012
Take it down
Frank Gerratana
4:13 pm on Monday, August 27, 2012
Yes, it should be taken down without question. This is a big issue for me. I've been helping Mike Connolly with his campaign for state representative in part because he agrees with me about it: http://somerville.patch.com/articles/no-money-candidate-to-hold-rally-under-mcgrath-highway
Mike has been working with S.T.E.P. and the Livable Streets Alliance to support the effort to remove the McCarthy Overpass -- and Cambridge City Councilor and State Representative Tim Toomey has been virtually absent on this issue.
AHM
6:48 pm on Monday, August 27, 2012
I agree it's ugly but to take it down is unrealistic. It has made it more tolerable than the way it was before. We would need to go back to the amount of vehicles that were on the roads in the 40's to make tearing it down work at all. I guess only those of us who were then would know. Either way it's a lose lose situation.
Jonah Petri
9:26 am on Tuesday, August 28, 2012
In the 40s there was no superhighway — interstate 93 — just a few blocks away. McGrath is superfluous.
Michael J Wade
11:06 am on Tuesday, August 28, 2012
In the 40's the population was 25,000 more than it is now.
MJ
8:34 pm on Monday, August 27, 2012
It maybe ugly but I think traffic in the area would become unbearable if it was taken down. Perhaps a nicer design is called for.
Lucas Rogers
10:25 pm on Monday, August 27, 2012
Tear it town.